Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 284: Hidden Service v3 Control Port

[meejah <meejah@xxxxxxxxx>]

David Goulet <dgoulet@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Indeed.
>
> I'm unsure between
>     "512 Syntax error in command argument"
>
>     "552 Unrecognized entity"
>         [A configuration key, a stream ID, circuit ID, event,
>          mentioned in the command did not actually exist.]
>
> But overall yes!

It looks like the previous code would have done a 512 (when ADD_ONION
existed but didn't support authentication yet) so that's probably good
here too.

...but, maybe "513 Unrecognized command argument" would be a good
candidate, too?

...or even a new one for this case (and future cases) of "recognized,
but not yet supported". "560 Not yet implemented" or similar?

-- 
meejah
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev