[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Descriptor fingerprint format
- To: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Descriptor fingerprint format
- From: Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 01:29:27 -0400
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-dev-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 01:29:33 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=rA4MnSqNqPZ6Bl65C4+uNrZH/ScUtx6OQZ8+oQt4ia8=; b=G/Gn6pOh5rSDXUR6wgelHbfcVGCbqBVMq1RZkXgKWZB2g59Q81kkYQwVNCCFl2rrPC rHEmcSKRpHVGtJFfFjwc8p4PScJIsEqn7FfJ+KQjbrwWjppewoZ6/KGDZfqC+5f1C5OX nkURBZ1gcELLY4FvAYWtXOJKWOZfIuTxbHIg4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=v4Lgep8XE8SgxrtKCgduA0qlyD+/oD9WuBwLX61BTob4mF6N/d18MPSk7JfVLfU+dl mOaqfQukMphBwVzpk57SINoQzgGx3iuUPFAVhFmA+oQ/3QWynRsgljF/GZIAKHEljZ9r Cvp6+YiiUQvGxbOw94pflzPFW9OScM0tUBpSY=
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=BOHA9n83oUeaJhdu=Gy-dvrdrwZ23bmc+t-p5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <AANLkTi=BOHA9n83oUeaJhdu=Gy-dvrdrwZ23bmc+t-p5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 8:23 PM, grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> Any ideas on removing these two someday?
Have a look at proposal 158?
--
Nick