[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[tor-dev] Torsocks 2.x issue - Need eyes on that



Hi everyone,

I stumble upon an issue when testing torsocks[1] with firefox. I'm still
wondering how this can be fixed thus I need more eyes on this :). The
issue is that torsocks gets into a deadlock during the initialization
phase within the libc.

Here it is. This new torsocks version hijacks the "syscall" symbol
(syscall(2)) in order to intercept applications that decides to do some
network operations with that interface. To do that, the torsocks library
constructor (executed before the application main()) lookup the original
symbol in the libc (dlopen(3)) and is used for unhandled syscall values
(for instance open(2)).

Now the issue was detected with firefox which uses a custom malloc hook
meaning that it handles its own memory allocation. This hook uses mmap()
that firefox redefines to be a direct syscall(__NR_mmap, ...) and
remember that this symbol is hijacked by torsocks.

Torsocks constructor calls dlsym() to get the original libc syscall
symbol. This call locks a "loading lock" inside the libc:

	dlfcn/dlsym.c +68: __rtld_lock_lock_recursive (GL(dl_load_lock));

Just after, dlerror_run is called which does a calloc() which then calls
the firefox malloc hook and calls syscall() for mmap that torsocks
hijacks. In torsocks, syscall() make a check on the original libc
syscall pointer to see if it's NULL or not and if NULL, tries to look it
up with dlsym(). And there you have the deadlock.

dlsym --> LOCK --> dlerror_run --> calloc --> syscall() --> dlsym() -->
dlerror_run --> DEADLOCK.

It's a bit of a catch 22 because torsocks is basically looking for the
libc syscall symbol but then it gets call inside that lookup code
path...

To be honest, I am not sure what's the right fix here or if there is any
way to lookup the symbol in a "special" way that would help here. Any
idea or questions are VERY welcome :).

Hope this explanation is clear enough, this is a "not that trivial"
issue.

Cheers!
David

[1] https://github.com/dgoulet/torsocks.git

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev