[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: tor-spec comments

To: or-dev@freehaven.net
Subject: Re: tor-spec comments
From: "Joel N. Weber II" <ordev@joelweber.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 13:48:57 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-dev-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-dev@seul.org
Delivery-date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 13:49:33 -0400
In-reply-to: <1062523456.17514.278.camel@totoro.wangafu.net> (message fromNick Mathewson on Tue, 02 Sep 2003 13:24:16 -0400)
References: <E19spWy-0007Ee-00@xanthine.gratuitous.org> <20030830021334.O7514@moria.mit.edu> <1062523456.17514.278.camel@totoro.wangafu.net>
Reply-to: or-dev@freehaven.net
Sender: owner-or-dev@freehaven.net

OK, so I'm convinced that using TLS for the actual cells is probably
the wrong approach.

Would it be reasonable to use the TLS key negotiation (d-h, rsa, etc)
stuff for the cells, though?

Follow-Ups:
- Using TLS for circuit-level handshake (Was Re: tor-spec comments)
  - From: Roger Dingledine <arma@mit.edu>

References:
- Re: tor-spec comments
  - From: Nick Mathewson <nickm@alum.mit.edu>

Prev by Author: Re: TLS, threads, and workers
Next by Author: Re: Using TLS for circuit-level handshake (Was Re: tor-spec comments)
Previous by thread: Re: tor-spec comments
Next by thread: Using TLS for circuit-level handshake (Was Re: tor-spec comments)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread