Re: [tor-dev] Reproducibility of Pluggable Transports python.msi

[Jeremy Rand <biolizard89@xxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 09/09/2015 06:43 PM, Brandon Wiley wrote:
> Another option here, besides getting python to build in gitian is
> to phase out support for python-based pluggable transports. It's
> something to consider at least. Which transports are still only
> available in python?

Indeed -- the reason I originally asked this question was to evaluate
whether Namecoin (of which I'm a developer) should keep developing
code in Python or whether we should port that code to Golang.  We
really want reproducible builds, and based on the info David and
Joseph have shared, Namecoin is probably going to (where feasible)
port to Golang (which Tor is successfully building reproducibly with
very minimal code).  I'm curious whether the Tor devs have come to a
similar conclusion.

Cheers,
- -Jeremy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=uyhm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev