Jesse V: > On 09/27/2016 02:39 AM, Jeremy Rand wrote: >> Relatedly -- I had some trouble summarizing some of the items in the >> Namecoin section because the security, privacy, and scalability >> properties of Namecoin are somewhat different depending on whether the >> user is using a full node (downloads the entire blockchain), a FBR-C >> node (receives full blocks that can contain current name transactions), >> or a headers-only node (receives only block headers). >> >> I didn't want to change the layout of the page much without asking, but >> would it make sense to split the Namecoin section into multiple sections >> (a section for each of those node types)? Or is it preferred to keep >> them in 1 section and say which of the security properties / drawbacks >> apply to which node types (which is what I've done for the moment)? > > This is a fair point. I agree that we should split it up accordingly to > "Namecoin (full blockchain)" and "Namecoin (thin/SPV client)". Both have > different descriptions, security properties, and drawbacks so it would > probably be more organized this way. Sounds good. I'm happy to do the split, but it might take me a few days before I have the time to make those edits. Cheers, -Jeremy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev