[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: descriptor published, but router missing from consensus

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: descriptor published, but router missing from consensus
From: DC <newswiki@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:27:34 +0800
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tor-relays-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:27:43 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SGgPtEYZ1fk3tL3tKO5HNVD8+60MzQOWedOJuDz4DxM=; b=dG2q2NiRLEPxHo2zKkh6ThatZbjaj7oIXpchKf+691bPAkAlM0Bx8a1bqkZiycZ7Af Ztrz/bJ1KF6vjNtfLGAiXdRNtUXN4UAT/1YdrgENC7t9ckgeJ3sqvgkvGY39uM/nSBqr eYur3zcU+UBhXDUvSxqSTmucelOwmrRKSGceI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=tmhDJpkQXMIywX53D3EFKPVrjYukdAV6VSPGv7vJgfYTZqeW7SKma57BWzgIQGdoo9 9v2x8jtorn4Sc2DPaeMNfe0KbLTAdg7QtMgDwEvS/tnyerXOB/eFF3sekDFSWeOpi9BH 03a8mB7ep8FvldBZE2WJnzOTQoXw9QWeQP4NY=
In-reply-to: <k2z1c3299321004100707h86e0e7bbyddbeb9895268d832@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <201004092253.o39MrFYI028843@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100410122535.GA56099@tabulara> <k2z1c3299321004100707h86e0e7bbyddbeb9895268d832@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

strangely your downgrade is my original setup that not working for me.
so i decided to have the latest tor version and
openssl-0.9.8e-12.el5_4.6 then it work for a while. now the problem is
back again.

On 4/10/10, Dyno Tor <dynotor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> FYI, I experienced the same problems, using tor-0.2.1.25-tor.0.rh5_4
> and openssl-0.9.8e-12.el5_4.6.  These are the standard CentOS OpenSSL
> and Tor repositiory for Centos 5.4.  As suggested I used "yum
> downgrade openssl" and got openssl-0.9.8e-12.el5_4.1, which works
> fine.  So it definitely has something to do with openssl, but isn't
> just specific to 1.0.  It's something that got backported to RHEL's
> maintained openssl, so it probably is some security fix that got
> published as part of openssl 1.0, but backported to RHEL/CentOS.
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: descriptor published, but router missing from consensus
  - From: Sebastian Hahn

References:
- Re: descriptor published, but router missing from consensus
  - From: Scott Bennett
- Re: descriptor published, but router missing from consensus
  - From: Hans Schnehl
- Re: descriptor published, but router missing from consensus
  - From: Dyno Tor

Prev by Author: Re: descriptor published, but router missing from consensus
Next by Author: Re: [SUCCESS] Re: descriptor published, but router missing from consensus
Previous by thread: Re: descriptor published, but router missing from consensus
Next by thread: Re: descriptor published, but router missing from consensus
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread