[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] avoiding frequent MyFamily syncing on a dynamic Tor instance group

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] avoiding frequent MyFamily syncing on a dynamic Tor instance group
From: tagnaq <tagnaq@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 01:01:22 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 19:03:09 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AsszzY7MCsPfKJoH9scUAyVwEmmdh/LtcKk2JYmWYlg=; b=oqnPB8JKUhUbYMlXdFAJgIS14w58Gp68C9Ci1ZBEcN1In+HGMLxKUDlogykmWJrRFm JmD26043gmOu1JLxf2vnWRIjxYQQ7m4yAa4ey4YtTQopLOIKzde/XCPH925fA7hsYhb1 SlU/vxl/fWM5cFcuVP7qacYjM7SzAZW2bInqE=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=oe9eCvyS2Ne7rR9YAmUg+F62VfVa8t62JFJjBIMNz1SNCb/ltiCfnk6kB9g50u2Rab GYrgSeeOqKevEf6f7NbvWs1E5/D92BKiOWSt1LHxKkHUoR2Ke8Fr+qiuCIm019TNR5Iq De4TciYQJ6azMqOhq2Dfl1Q/XIXLplfN0OuG8=
In-reply-to: <201104062224.04661.cmeclax-sazri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "This mailing list is for support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)." <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4D9CF917.9010707@xxxxxxxxx> <201104062224.04661.cmeclax-sazri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 04/07/2011 04:24 AM, cmeclax-sazri wrote:
> What does the program actually do?

To my understanding only mutual agreements result in a valid MyFamily
set. Unidirectional definitions would result in certain attacks.
(this has been discussed on tor-talk a while ago)

rransom, thanks for the explanation regarding the effect on the
descriptor size.

tagnaq
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

References:
- [tor-relays] avoiding frequent MyFamily syncing on a dynamic Tor instance group
  - From: tagnaq
- Re: [tor-relays] avoiding frequent MyFamily syncing on a dynamic Tor instance group
  - From: cmeclax-sazri

Prev by Author: [tor-relays] avoiding frequent MyFamily syncing on a dynamic Tor instance group
Next by Author: [tor-relays] Persistent XSS vulnerability in TorStatus
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] avoiding frequent MyFamily syncing on a dynamic Tor instance group
Next by thread: [tor-relays] two relays serving same hidden service
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread