Re: [tor-relays] Metrics for assessing EFF's Tor relay challenge?

[Nikita Borisov <nikita@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Karsten Loesing <karsten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Right now, the script sums up all graphs contained in Onionoo's
> bandwidth, clients, uptime, and weights documents.  It also limits the
> range of the new graphs to max(first) to max(last) of given input graphs.
>
> For example, assume we want to know the total bandwidth provided by the
> following 2 relays participating in the relay challenge:
>
> datetime:  0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ...
>
> relay 1:     [5, 4, 5, 6]
> relay 2:  [4, 3, 5, 4]
>
> combined:    [8, 9, 9, 6]
>
> This is not perfect for various reasons, but it's the best I came up
> with yesterday.  Also, as we all know, perfect is the enemy of good.
>
> (If you're curious, reason #1: the graph goes down at the end, and we
> can't say whether it's because relay 2 disappeared or did not report
> data yet; reason #2: we're weighting both relays' B/s equally, though
> relay 1 might have been online 24/7 and relay 2 only long enough that
> Onionoo doesn't put in null; there may be more reasons.)

For the relay challenge, wouldn't you want to include the entire
period that data is available for (i.e., min(first) to max(last))?
Otherwise, if you are looking at a month's worth of data and a new
relay arrives on the last day, your graph would only contain that day.

Also, I think you would want to do datetime.strptime(max(first), ...)
here: https://github.com/kloesing/challenger/blob/master/challenge.py#L177-L178
Otherwise you're just taking the last relay's first and last values as
the new_first and new_last.

Cheers,
- Nikita
-- 
Nikita Borisov - http://hatswitch.org/~nikita/
Associate Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering
Tel: +1 (217) 244-5385, Office: 460 CSL
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays