Re: [tor-relays] does it make sense to close unused ports at a tor relay with iptables ?

["Dr Gerard Bulger" <gerard@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks +++

Simple really


-----Original Message-----
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Daniel Llewellyn
Sent: 28 April 2016 15:35
To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] does it make sense to close unused ports at a tor relay with iptables ?



On 28/04/16 14:33, Dr Gerard Bulger wrote:
> Currently the rules are thus: 
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 9030 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp 
> --dport 9051 -j ACCEPT Which opens up those TOR ports on BOTH my IPs, 
> not what I want (OK torrc is listening to the second IP, but that is 
> fiddly to set up for each service)
>
> I want my normal ports to be open on 1st IP and shut on second IP.  
to block per IP Address you can amend to use the following form:

-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -d <your tor IP> --dport 9030 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -d <your tor IP> --dport 9051 -j ACCEPT

P.S. this email is not GnuPG signed because I'm having issues with enigmail, ubuntu, gpg-agent and yubikey

--
Daniel Llewellyn, Bowl Hat
PGP/GnuPG Key ID: 0x0349ED21
4C9C BFAD 0069 D679 9660 BCD5 40C2 D958 0349 ED21


_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays