[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[tor-relays] [warn] circuit_mark_for_close under (Linux 4.4.0-21-generic) Tor 0.2.9.10

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tor-relays] [warn] circuit_mark_for_close under (Linux 4.4.0-21-generic) Tor 0.2.9.10
From: Paul <pa011@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:06:41 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 12:06:58 -0400
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:

[warn] circuit_mark_for_close_(): Bug: Duplicate call to circuit_mark_for_close at ../src/or/onion.c:238 (first at ../src/or/command.c:579) (on Tor 0.2.9.10 )

Can this warning be neglected - I thought it is a BSD and not a Linux issue?
Got nearly a hundred of them today - all with the same time stamp.

Thanks - Paul
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Relay traffic went to ~zero
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Relay traffic went to ~zero
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Relay traffic went to ~zero
Next by thread: [tor-relays] maatuska's bwscanner down since 2017-04-14 -> significant drop in relay traffic
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread