Re: [tor-relays] Alternative hoster (Re: DigitalOcean bandwidth billing changes)

[conrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Hello,

In reference to this issue, I am willing to provide an alternative
solution that doesn't rely on thge big 3 remaining providers that are
over saturated ASNs within the network, however, I would like to gauge
how many people would be generally interested in such an endeavor
before I go out and execute on it.

So before I invest in the hardware for a nonprofit "collective" of
sorts at my friendly downtown colo facility, I would like to get an
idea of how many people are interested in this, because then I could do
some formulations to determine what to offer to break even. Easy Peasy.

Please respond to my personal email and not to the list. Thank you.

Rock

On Wed, 2018-04-25 at 16:55 +0200, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> On 25.04.18 16:48, Tobias Sachs wrote:
> 
> > The interesting thing about Hetzer is that only outgoing traffic is
> > counted towards the billing.
> 
> D.O. does the same. Still, $0.01 per extra GB is theft in my book.
> 
> > https://twitter.com/Knightyyyy1/status/988868691868749825
> 
> Unfortunately I beat your stats by quite a margin. :-P
> 
> -Ralph
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays