Hi, > On 8. Apr 2021, at 14:50, David Goulet <dgoulet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07 Apr (21:43:50), Toralf Förster wrote: >> On 4/7/21 9:04 PM, David Goulet wrote: >>> Over time, we will remove or add more relays at each minor release if the set >>> of fallback directories not working reaches a 25% threshold or more. >> >> In the past a fallback dir volunteer committed himself to have address >> and port stable for 2 years. >> >> If a relay is now removed from the fallback directory list - how long >> shall the Tor relay operator wait before he can change the address >> and/or port? > > No more requirements of such anymore. By selecting Stable and relays that have > been around for a while, the theory is that the majority of relays of the > selected list will be stable as in same address and port. > > I do hope that overall in the network most relays do not change port/address > often as relay stability is pivotal to an healthy network. But if so, our > monitoring of the fallback directories will trigger an alert once too many > relays are not working anymore as fallback and so we'll issue a new list. Do we have some metrics in place to spot whether this improves/degrades bootstrapping performance and how it develops over time? Cheers Sebastian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays