Re: [tor-relays] Planningon running bridge with bw limitation - config help

[Gordon Morehouse <gordon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Kostas Jakeliunas:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Moritz Bartl
> <moritz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On 13.08.2013 08:02, Kali Tor wrote:
>>> I am actually in double minds about using obsproxy. Is there a
>>> demand
>> for it?
>> 
>> Yes! Please do set up obfsproxy.
> 
> 
> Since obfsproxy bridges are usually really low traffic, I think
> the combination of an obfsproxy bridge and raspberrypi makes quite
> a bit of sense (that's what I'm running in any case, no problems so
> far (I also had to compile Tor for armv6 from source)) :)


I'm curious about this: since it appears the Great Firewall of China
blocks (IP, port) tuples - is there any reason *not* to run a
non-obfsproxy port on a bridge that is also running obfsproxy?

Currently on one of my bridges I run all three - the normal bridge
protocol, obfs2 and obfs3 on different ports.

Best,
- -Gordon M.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSCkwEAAoJED/jpRoe7/ujLuQH/iIiuoVdhSZuYol5s+8PEBA5
tpCUgVRxlW+5lBzDd1XRuM9BC/qQo0ocfMTAXtGv8frBPD9LL5GvIRhAiuAsoiow
CMQXIDrqNkvLSyP3q/IEjLs2uVInFnMkjuNASe9goruZo7Pcl7mlpV1JVf+uyuTi
l901xJVIcx6B42ewQAbOQ+V+jsqcWfvy2jMW4lxUZpMgW/gaN4w+1Mvq7VQYocab
KQyxz5omla5xOVOsUqA0erjd5jFr7+Mdq+/b+WgVJD1Co4Mkd31r+X9QEpxr1H1Y
BZ7fcA+SVC83RqK5YVMLsBiXmqkOp4rtKyQdCzV+94fSoGze95aOTGLZaj4Uv0Q=
=ncak
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays