On 8/3/2016 10:13 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:29:01PM +0200, tor@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> Absolutely. Most of the infrastructure we provide on that basis and it >> is ok! The reason for running that exit node was that we believed it >> would contribute towards a positive impact in many peoples lives. > > Thanks for contributing while you did! > > I'm remembering way back when I would mail all the people running relays > to see if they needed anything. Then there was the phase where we got > some funding for Moritz to do relay operator advocacy and coordination: > https://blog.torproject.org/blog/turning-funding-more-exit-relays > and that push also led to some cool sites like > https://compass.torproject.org/ > > Among all the things that we need to do next, I think getting a relay > advocate / coordinator in place would sure be useful. I think there are > so many things that we need, though, that it's going to be a while yet > before we get such a person in place. > > In the mean time, hang tight everybody, and let's continue to have a > community who helps each other, and thanks all for your contributions. > > --Roger > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > Well stated and thank-you, Roger. I agree 100% with the need for a more 'visible' advocacy in this age of headline reading and jumping to false conclusions for no factual reason.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays