[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[tor-relays] Go home GeoIP, you're drunk.

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tor-relays] Go home GeoIP, you're drunk.
From: Ralph Seichter <tor-relays-ml@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 23:52:00 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 18:00:51 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=horus-it.de; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-language:content-type :content-type:mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id :subject:subject:from:from; s=alpha; t=1501797121; x=1504389122; bh=D03wjhuKd3vCdi5OxyW0/Be1SALLQxYLNq+R/WnGP6M=; b=ms1aDX8AKvCM jIkrJWHOuFLOxqC7bC5MQLhtinCNXj0EE2Sfh/UKGi+d+HQwNmLl6uDqr8YcZjLo B2XdmcRKdlIsCsRJHclZ1nO7rgfwztWvqZBRrjpkl2oibaIU+1uw0f8/9RhoeaPS lUA0v44ztDk+riwVGkL4ZDYlr3jCj5pckEDKbw2OpcGQdG2XuYWWffpGETReOQ1u U0mIcIyMhfn1FqIoHRUXFa3UmRwiprPBFM4PHWFnO6SZoy3tdG9b0pYwIb49qTWf gmv4Slyvuvm8t0a1QiflDURhdheiIX9kFcG3GTwxBcpNwWOQfDxcmBUoKNy0sRh3 gY+RvABjxg==
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1

I moved a Tor relay to new hardware, keeping the keys. Both old and new
server are located in Germany and provided by the same hosting company.
After the latest Atlas update, I was surprised to see that the IPv4
address is listed as belonging to an AS in Ukraine. A little more
digging returned Guangzhou, China, as the supposed location based on the
server's IPv6 address.

Is there anything I can/should do about this (I doubt it)? Will this
affect my Tor node consensus weight? As it is not an exit node, I am
hoping it won't matter much.

-Ralph
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] Go home GeoIP, you're drunk.
  - From: Alexander Nasonov
- Re: [tor-relays] Go home GeoIP, you're drunk.
  - From: niftybunny
- Re: [tor-relays] Go home GeoIP, you're drunk.
  - From: Roger Dingledine

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Tor 0.3.0.10 not listed as a recommended version
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Go home GeoIP, you're drunk.
Previous by thread: [tor-relays] freebsd-ports; tor, obfs4, browser & socks
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Go home GeoIP, you're drunk.
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread