[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] bwauth in testing

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] bwauth in testing
From: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 22:17:34 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 16:17:49 -0400
In-reply-to: <CA+cU71=mzuC_QiuKbsDEJrje1voho5Pm6SAcAdBPbZaDv77ZwQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CA+cU71=7dw5RZOTjKozydsuH48-cGz3Uyb9JLqRoO7WCWOgq+Q@mail.gmail.com> <e4174abe-88f8-a7c8-da12-a97eca7a7fde@gmx.de> <CA+cU71=mzuC_QiuKbsDEJrje1voho5Pm6SAcAdBPbZaDv77ZwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 08/16/2017 10:06 PM, Tom Ritter wrote:
> That is because gabelmoo's bwauth dropped off. Now there are only 3
> bwauths in the system, and your relay was not measured by one of them
> (faravahar). With only 2 measurements, you get kicked down to the
> default I believe.
> 
> The good news is that my bwauth measured you at 75600, which is a bit
> below the other two measurements, but in line with them. So once
> maatuska starts voting on this data you'll be popped back up.
> 
> Please bear with us while we get this sorted out! =)

Ah, thx for the info.
I was a little bit unsettled /c I changed my iptables ruleset around the same time where BW dropped down.

- -- 
Toralf
PGP C4EACDDE 0076E94E
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EAREIADUWIQQaN2+ZSp0CbxPiTc/E6s3eAHbpTgUCWZSoXhccdG9yYWxmLmZv
ZXJzdGVyQGdteC5kZQAKCRDE6s3eAHbpTiJMAP4ub+dfutsNsy2AAh7+VXMV02w1
93Ip29pWoSSVY7W6RgEAjH13/sYtfGdNojN/k5nE5w8DAsB1FKM8DMP6d7BBpgw=
=f5qG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

References:
- [tor-relays] bwauth in testing
  - From: Tom Ritter
- Re: [tor-relays] bwauth in testing
  - From: Toralf Förster
- Re: [tor-relays] bwauth in testing
  - From: Tom Ritter

Prev by Author: [tor-relays] outdated key files in ./keys ?
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] blocking >1 connections per ip address onto Tor DirPort
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] bwauth in testing
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] bwauth in testing
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread