Re: [tor-relays] Relay uptime versus outdated Tor version

Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Relay uptime versus outdated Tor version

From: Chuck McAndrew <chuck.mcandrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 10:24:07 -0400

Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 10:24:23 -0400

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=leblibrary.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=nwpervvyJuZOQE2m1PbKDIkYS95yI0GowcHmgjIcCDE=; b=H8ZsC6mT7VcnK2jujhCgdbZjiSyAgmbGcrefL4GF96rwz3WuiX9I68wyRDD6iKdgPV FIx3+pefB7PZjGJoumL+htRRuubT7qtTaxAzZVmpYt+bbAHo6DOgB63+OLsy4QIYg2/E ElHhAmbXpqnBjoboeTXrGrKT73EKhfFZ2PrBQ=

In-reply-to: <CAAcC93vp0Keo8ywwSgAKk+DkHTa8-jnp4+WGtu-s-P=CaQLX2A@mail.gmail.com>

List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>

List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>

List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>

List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>

List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>

List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>

References: <CAAcC93smVR-WPFNEaHQdAA60AVv_TRkM9uNNGRaee8G2HC0K_g@mail.gmail.com> <CAAcC93vsx8M1VdiND8B+7-S3QPQbkk9HjYnvb+oTts5Ww=r7rw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAcC93uV_6jixyWuCvzUHkh5N=O0EZPOWTAVkP0ZQCOWmfw8Fw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAcC93tmwR2j3KReP_=FzZSYRPCJPYODJTWn0gZGrYzQbdABmA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAcC93su3SDRb+9jzzpNvbyFLBMbHYsNHCf9X3uavWTxuoXWVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAcC93saxvHZH28RboYOUTjV+3t4s5QQZmWQDK3p4zKKiU0HCQ@mail.gmail.com> <nVD3bXK0typSzNFT9hZcFSoMOI4UvsNA_N9NSsonnl6UFCQsJ8R3QrQW1FAhe_Q-z9580zIaNtV1EipFDYi-UCREzcAgVrcYOTCdIHlskJc=@anondroid.com> <65977ee7-05a2-888b-98e2-44a38a0fb0ee@riseup.net> <CAAcC93vp0Keo8ywwSgAKk+DkHTa8-jnp4+WGtu-s-P=CaQLX2A@mail.gmail.com>

Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Uptime used to be something to brag about. Now it just means you aren't regularly updating. This is true for any kind of server, not just a relay.

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:17 AM, K. Besig <suprleg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Lol....I'll frame it and then upgrade both...thanks for the kick in the rear..

On Aug 16, 2017 2:34 PM, "Petrusko" <petrusko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And why not taking a screenshot + print it to remember :p

tor :
> You'll lose your uptime, but... don't be ridiculous. It's better to
> keep Tor up-to-date. That uptime undoubtedly means you're running an
> outdated kernel too, which is not ideal. I think it would be wise to
> take the hit and update both.

--
Petrusko
C0BF 2184 4A77 4A18 90E9 F72C B3CA E665 EBE2 3AE5

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxg
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

The Right-To-Know Law provides that most e-mail communications, to or from Lebanon Public Libraries employees regarding the business of the library, are government records available to the public upon request. Therefore, this e-mail communication may be subject to public disclosure.

_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays