Andy Isaacson <adi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 10.12.2011: > If it's a decent NIC (Intel or Broadcom) then I'd agree with you. If > it's a RTL or other sub-par vendor / driver, then you're overly > optimistic. lspci shows: 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit Network Connection 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit Network Connection I assume this should be a decent NIC. > Wait, you're seeing these DNS failures with "nameserver 127.0.0.1" in > /etc/hosts? That's more interesting, since then DNS UDP lossage on GigE > pacet loss is unlikely to be the cause. > > Could you clarify the configuration? Is Tor doing DNS over the GigE or > to localhost? > > -andy Yes I have configure a local caching DNS server. cat /etc/resolve.conf shows nameserver 127.0.0.1. So I assume TOR resolves via the local configured DNS. I verified with nslookup. DNS requests indeed go through the 127.0.0.1:53. Thanks, Klaus
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays