Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]

[Gordon Morehouse <gordon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Travis Northrup:
> Yes, it can. The program can spend the processor time to run that
> extra instruction set. Do we actually need or want that? Would it
> be worth spending the cpu time in exchange for just a miniscule
> effort to do it ourselves?

Are you really arguing something like 1000 cycles on a modern
processor (so, what, a microsecond, tops) vs 5 minutes of human effort?

Is this maybe an example of why crypto software UX is almost
universally god-awful?

Best,
- -Gordon M.

> On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 3:53:25 PM, Gordon Morehouse wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
> 
>> Travis Northrup:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> This argument (Mbit/s versus GiB/month) reminds me of the
>>>> old saw about the most useless unit of velocity
>>>> (furlongs/fortnight instead of m/sec).
>>> 
>>>> Mick
>>> 
>>> I know exactly what you mean. Personally, I consider any change
>>> to be a convenience modification only. In reality the only
>>> current differences are in defining storage rate and traffic
>>> rate (1024/1000 respectively) and its defined in bits. From
>>> there all conversions are simple math that should be operator 
>>> responsibility.
> 
>> Why, when the config file can be liberal in what it accepts in
>> the numerator, and in the denominator (seconds, days, weeks, mean
>> months)?
> 
>> Calculating numbers is a job for a computer.
> 
>> Best, - -Gordon M.
>> 

> 
> _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing
> list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 

- -- 
Sent from my thing that sends email.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSm+Y+AAoJED/jpRoe7/ujPRYH/1agvqhrhhk7/uqNr9oEW+Wi
A7fJ2Z6Dt/j+b1A9ty05regLN5q+4t9JE5A492j146v8aJEcZoAWU6718ug8n1Kq
wzX0t5oWl36UivFr99pVvKTf1YHEQ9BCx4S88bbkUn6IvYFv/z8n4o+Kw2dutYDO
Zgl0NGaPrc5IgAglGv6p2Kjc9TON8bkIYJENkbaW58kVEeCad9Sel3i2ZDrC7E2R
WJw8E51n472HpbYbCu5L/zuijzjxpYdjI0Nu3KI3Qci9Uozkpgq2N7bo3n2rzYMI
ufwSnyqAwQLH1ZCkYhYVbR4uEuNRGP2/sAUXrKdhYVNE6c3MsCY/Zm51nnDzHX4=
=GzbJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays