eliaz transcribed 0.9K bytes: > Can a bridge carry client traffic even though the bridge hasn't been > assigned to a pool? > > This is evidently the case for my bridge. It's been running for quite a > while and registering respectable bandwidth and client use. Uptime has > been near 100%. The only downtimes have been to install OS (win7) > updates and other housekeeping. I usually do this housekeeping monthly > rather than weekly. > > As I recall, for previous restarts I've seen pool assignments within a > few hours. They've sometimes been https, sometimes email. But this last > restart has been running two weeks and the bridge DB shows no pool > assignment. > > Has anyone else experienced this? What's the remedy? > > If it would help anyone figure this out I can post details, graphs, etc. > along as they don't compromise the bridge. - eliaz Hello! Unless something is broken, BridgeDB is still assigning your bridge to a distribution pool. However, if you're looking at your bridge in Atlas [0], then the "bridge pool assignment" field has been removed, and it should soon be removed from Globe [1] as well. See #13921. [2] [0]: https://atlas.torproject.org [1]: https://globe.torproject.org [2]: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13921 -- ââ isis agora lovecruft _________________________________________________________ OpenPGP: 4096R/0A6A58A14B5946ABDE18E207A3ADB67A2CDB8B35 Current Keys: https://blog.patternsinthevoid.net/isis.txt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays