Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

[diffusae <punasipuli@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ahh, ok. It looks like, that should be a bit more that 1 MB/s.

Regards,

On 06.12.2016 22:10, SuperSluether wrote:
> I don't know the actual numbers for the Raspberry Pi 1, I was just
> quoting from Duncan:
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2016-December/011182.html
> 
> 
> On 12/06/2016 03:00 PM, diffusae wrote:
>> Well, I can read and also now the translation from Bits to Bytes.
>> But I am not sure about your value of the maximum network capacity.
>>
>> That's the iperf3 measurement of a Raspberry Pi 1 Model B+:
>>
>> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
>> [  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  83.6 MBytes  8.36 MBytes/sec  141
>> sender
>> [  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  83.1 MBytes  8.31 MBytes/sec
>> receiver
>>
>> Also arm shows me an average of 9 MB/s.
>>
>> Maybe they have change the USB LAN chip?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> On 06.12.2016 19:20, Tristan wrote:
>>> Again, bits or bytes. I can't believe I'm repeating myself, don't you
>>> people read?
>>>
>>> The ORIGINAL (version 1) Raspberry Pi had a max of 1 MegaBYTE.
>>>
>>> 1 MegaBYTE = 8 megaBITS
>>>
>>> Obviously other factors limit performance, but looking at just the
>>> maximum network capacity of a Raspberry Pi 1, it could handle 8Mbit/s.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 6, 2016 11:16 AM, "Rana" <ranaventures@xxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:ranaventures@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>
>>>      -----Original Message-----
>>>      From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>      <mailto:tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of
>>> pa011
>>>      Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 1:24 AM
>>>      To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>      <mailto:tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>      Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with
>>>      dynamic IP
>>>
>>>
>>>      > I would like to hear about ONE Raspi Tor operator who was allowed
>>>      by DirAuths (or bwauths or whatever)  to come even near 1 mbit/s
>>>      bandwidth utilization
>>>      >
>>>
>>>      let me tell:
>>>     
>>> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/AA44C4BE3C90DCAAC09E5CD26150710AAA80D58B
>>>
>>>     
>>> <https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/AA44C4BE3C90DCAAC09E5CD26150710AAA80D58B>
>>>
>>>     
>>> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/CA9A5D5C4688F04EEC1AF810B0FD348109FA17FB
>>>
>>>     
>>> <https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/CA9A5D5C4688F04EEC1AF810B0FD348109FA17FB>
>>>
>>>
>>>      are sharing the same dynamic IP on a Rasp2 -cut every 24 hours
>>>
>>>               day         rx      |     tx      |    total    |  
>>> avg. rate
>>>              
>>> ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
>>>           05.12.2016    27,20 GiB |   28,39 GiB |   55,59 GiB |    5,40
>>>      Mbit/s
>>>
>>>
>>>      that is slight above 1 Mbit/s  :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>      Best regards
>>>
>>>      Paul
>>>      ----------------------------
>>>
>>>      Wow nice bandwidth you are pushing through Paul! You mean two Raspi
>>>      2's sharing an Internet connection, each relaying 27 Gbytes per day
>>>      at 5.4 Mbit/s on the average?? Total 10.8 Mbit/s?? Or 2.7 Mbit/s
>>> each?
>>>
>>>      Definitely refutes the previously claimed 1 Mbit/s Tor limit on
>>>      Raspi, and means that Raspi has nothing to do with the ridiculously
>>>      low utilization of my relay, just as I thought. As a matter of fact
>>>      this means that whoever is NOT running a relay on a Raspi  (or two,
>>>      or four of them) is wasting money, unless he has a computer lying
>>>      about with nothing better to do.
>>>
>>>      Also, what's the max memory and CPU utilization on your Raspi (I
>>>      have read somewhere that Tor is only capable of utilizing 2 of
>>> the 4
>>>      CPU cores), and what kind of Internet connection do you have?
>>>
>>>       BTW the $35 Raspi 3 has 33% more CPU power than your Raspi 2 and
>>>      the same amount of memory.
>>>
>>>      Rana
>>>
>>>      _______________________________________________
>>>      tor-relays mailing list
>>>      tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>      https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>>>      <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tor-relays mailing list
>>> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays