[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Inconsistent BW measurements of unused relay

To: <tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Inconsistent BW measurements of unused relay
From: "Rana" <ranaventures@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 16:56:47 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 09:57:04 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language; bh=vWm8Eg+ihOd1CicN6B7mJpFBMmFLOPNCA3S96AzpD4I=; b=PTz68ZIPqRbEcsnYbn/83mtrP5dKsSZa62ZGk3kSkLy0rkTUAduVSowCZzKa/Nd2zW VWm1qH8JN67iT+MKJF5/B34uNp8YXVI49ib7GVKUlUPaJ5Abh35uQULhWJrCTuuwgLX/ U5d0rkLqo6+Ef7t3+bxcBcvPDi+f3+7VA+ba9WF94QFu9Bt0qoGN3ld0x0kkXq6NuYn+ 2H/5tEt7dJi5AfjkhKGosEBlBCvHLzRDciXyuXFlauA1dA50RyvQByuHLM56W4U6IGJZ v002uiaskIpAn8M6e8zQimGvhf0jGrPi7sTxBHxO4xVftWsYegoHOmfYOpOPaPU876wr ZrSw==
In-reply-to: <26AAD4B8-54D9-418E-9B56-BA65DE0BB00D@gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays $exit, non-exit, bridge$" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <084a01d25258$836a7f00$8a3f7d00$@gmail.com> <D4004D73-23A9-4A3F-81AA-692177FC5622@gmail.com> <02ec01d253af$9b561d60$d2025820$@gmail.com> <26AAD4B8-54D9-418E-9B56-BA65DE0BB00D@gmail.com>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AQJWbrjrWAeuR54b1dbvxJWVmqf6kgGro4nLAaaoLcgBvw6JP5/SFQVQ

OK Tim thanks for the answers, I appreciate your patience with me [even though I "lack programming skills" :) ]

The one answer of yours that still does not make sense to me is that arm actually means Kbytes/sec and not kbits/sec  when it writes Kb/s

I have arm reporting average  of at least several tens of Kb/s all the time, and about 100 Kb/s most of the time,  and then I wind up with almost constant 200 bit/sec actual average rate over 6 hours, based on the total number of Mbytes sent that Tor reports in its log file. 

Even if the 200 bit/sec figure is somehow rounded to 8000 bit/ sec or even 8000 bytes/sec as you suggested , this does not make sense...

Rana

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] Inconsistent BW measurements of unused relay
  - From: teor

References:
- [tor-relays] Inconsistent BW measurements of unused relay
  - From: Rana
- Re: [tor-relays] Inconsistent BW measurements of unused relay
  - From: teor
- Re: [tor-relays] Inconsistent BW measurements of unused relay
  - From: Rana
- Re: [tor-relays] Inconsistent BW measurements of unused relay
  - From: teor

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] [tor-r@elays] What's a "useful" relay?
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Inconsistent BW measurements of unused relay
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Inconsistent BW measurements of unused relay
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread