Hi Patrick, I recommend that you just try it. Many people run several instances on the same hardware (even on same VMs) to saturate their line. You can just try if running a second relay will consume more bw. >> - basically, would it have any significant added value to the network? I can stress what s7r said: If it increases overall bandwidth, it is definately added value to the network. Regards, Matthias On 12/11/2016 06:18 PM, Patrick DERWAEL wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm running a relay in a VM on a physical server which is largely under used > Current advertised bandwidth 26MB, consensus 76500 > I'm considering running a second relay (2nd VM) on the very same > hardware, but this brings a few questions: > > - is there any issue running it at the same geographical place? > - would the current total BW effectively consumed (26MB) be divided in 2 > (i.e. no added value in BW)? > - basically, would it have any significant added value to the network? > > Thanks > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays