Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

["Rana" <ranaventures@xxxxxxxxx>]

@Patrice:

Yes both relays started with brand new identities and the one that is now clinically dead (nickname ZG0) has been wiped out and restarted with a new fingerprint AND a new IP address as I have a dynamic one and I rebooted my router to get a new one).

 Did not help, so obviously this has everything to do with the network and how dirauths/bwauths test the connection and vote, and absolutely nothing to do with the identity of the relay

See my previous messages to confirm that this has absolutely nothing to do with the capabilities of the Pi, which are a gross overkill for the use of (nickname) GG2 that the dirauths and bwauths allow. 


-----Original Message-----
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Patrice
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 2:57 AM
To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tor-relays] @Rana - with reference to: Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic

Hi,

I`ve read your post and questions, also about your 2 Raspberry PIs with the same setting but different locations.
I thought about it and my question is:
Did these to PIs got a new fresh identity on day zero?
If not, it`s worth a try, probably. Kill the old identities and let them by.

My fundamental idea is (and that`s why I am writing this): Does my behaviour with the relay (restarting, upgrading, not be onlinening) effect the measurement and therefore the throughput of my relay?


Cheers,
Patrice
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays