Re: [tor-relays] Issues with faravahar?

[Sina Rabbani <sina@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Tor Relay Operators,

Faravahar had some hardware issues last night, while I was on an airplane without internet access.
It took me a few hours to respond and I apologize for the delay.

Please note that redundancy is built into the network, and I am committed to operating this system with very high availability. A maintenance window to replace the hardware will be announced soon, this system has been running since 2012 and it's time to upgrade. 

All the best,
Sina


"Be the change that you wish to see in the world." - Mahatma Gandhi

----- On Dec 12, 2017, at 5:38 PM, teor teor2345@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> On 13 Dec 2017, at 08:17, tor <tor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>> this time though I ran Wireshark while started tor, and it appears tor is
>>> transmitting encrypted info over port 80.
>> 
>>> Surely tor shouldn't be transmitting unencrypted messages?
>> 
>> I'm not an expert on the protocol but you may just be looking at responses from
>> the proxy in front of Faravahar?
> 
> Tor's directory documents are public, and signed, and they only contain
> public keys. So it's entirely safe to transmit them unencrypted.
> 
> T
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays