Hi, > On 18 Dec 2019, at 02:17, NOC <tor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 16.12.2019 20:37, Ralph Seichter wrote: >> * NOC: >> >>> I see a great benefit here, you could default to IPv6 for everything >>> and enable IPv4 only as fallback [...] >> Preferring IPv6 over IPv4 is not even remotely the same as your original >> call to "lets drop all IPv4 only relays from consensus 2020 finally", as >> you wrote in message <08fee42f-f45d-a8c4-d4e6-c83c05b4fb08@xxxxxxxxxx>. > > Read the full sentence, dropping all IPv4 only relays is unavoidable because they can't reach relays behind CG-NAT, preferring IPv6 over IPv4 is only a handy side effect of this. There hasn't been any new information in this thread for some time, and it appears to be escalating, so I've asked the moderators to consider closing it. I've already shared some details of the grant here: > On 13 Dec 2019, at 17:26, teor <teor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The RIPE grant covers IPv6 address autodetection and self-testing. > If the feature is reliable enough, we may turn on IPv6 on dual-stack relays > by default. (When autodetection and self-testing both pass.) > > We don't have any plans to disable IPv4 on relays. We'll get back to you next year when we have a timeline, and some more specific information. T
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays