[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] [Looking for feedback] An easier way to declare families

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] [Looking for feedback] An easier way to declare families
From: nusenu <nusenu-lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 19:07:32 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 13:07:51 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1639505258; bh=us5K3e72y1GG199WF0F0P4cV3cLajzMwWSQdrohhFFM=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=KOahykVLQvx+b8VZSUNoc6DtPm6Xuf0LsGQ+qKDmJFs63VJywHFKsD5Y/7BmgDeWk xe9GcsCgHy/iws5Qb4vype2d1xQOisdkgndPGmcukTGCjfw4oJfrvGjyn8TYKnQbvU dZJftR8K0CXmBqrknIAwpPS3L+CmRpDXIzJTzdac=
In-reply-to: <CAKDKvux_KJY56_Gu2SORnf0V=mFhFZyhCTXwQ=JiYKf7b2uXmA@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAKDKvuxR08DcLTRt8g3snEZG87JNasM8AuyEYgoXwGfWiZxb_w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKDKvux_KJY56_Gu2SORnf0V=mFhFZyhCTXwQ=JiYKf7b2uXmA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Nick Mathewson:

  1) The proposal currently limits each relay to no more than 3 families.
Is that a reasonable upper bound?


Yes, 3 is a reasonable limit.

  2) We hadn't been planning to implement multi-family support right away,
though I could if needed.  Is that something that many operators would want?


I believe it is a rarely used feature, but
we could do some analysis to see how many use it currently.


Will the new family design with its bridge support be part of tor 0.4.7.x ?

--
https://nusenu.github.io
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] [Looking for feedback] An easier way to declare families
  - From: Nick Mathewson

References:
- Re: [tor-relays] [Looking for feedback] An easier way to declare families
  - From: Nick Mathewson

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] General overload -> DNS timeouts
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Incorrect "first seen" info
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] [Looking for feedback] An easier way to declare families
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] [Looking for feedback] An easier way to declare families
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread