Re: [tor-relays] Thoughts on new relay

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Any server from "new" countries are good. If you are relay in this time, that is good as well. Doing what you are doing now with your relay is more then you think. If people from your country see that somebody start to do what you do, more will come and join the network.

Keep server rolling.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: OpenPGP.js v0.9.0
Comment: http://openpgpjs.org
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=v8H0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On 10 February 2015 at 14:03, Niklas Femerstrand <nik@xxxxxxx> wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Moin,

Our relay is online as of Jan 23 and recently I've been thinking about
pivoting it into a bridge instead. The relay lives in Cambodia and may
naturally be a bit off from the rest of the network (latency).

Consensus weight is steadily increasing despite various initial
downtime incidents, which you can see in Atlas graphs. (We've had some
network upgrades and during a separate event even had a monkey yanking
the eth from the nic.)

Currently we advertise 435.66 KB/s and with our current ~9d 10h uptime
we have downloaded 3.6 GB resp uploaded 3.7 GB. Theoretically our
tubes fit 10 Mbps download and 30 Mbps upload.

The question is whether the relay is worth keeping with its current
setup or if we can contribute more by re-configuring into a bridge.
Unfortunately it is very risky for us to allow exit traffic, but we <3
any cipher packet.

Please advice!
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/94F806110B23E727AE8BAD74DD95B0EE0B7A8EEC

Regards,

King Kong

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=hV51
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

http://www.backbox.org

http://www.pentester.iz.rs