[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] automation needs of big relay ops (implemented as ansible role)

To: Moritz Bartl <moritz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Stainton <dstainton415@xxxxxxxxx>, arzhel@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] automation needs of big relay ops (implemented as ansible role)
From: Nusenu <nusenu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 22:48:20 +0000
Cc: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:48:42 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=openmailbox.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :in-reply-to:references:subject:subject:mime-version:from:from :date:date:message-id:received; s=openmailbox; t=1424213308; bh= X8a5StfUwZJaCetEZDkqQAI3yXSs0YQQXL2Tl8EytB4=; b=kvRzuIATgBT16IY2 bhwHZZs81wxlItuLwc7GguRruVCzZgpqmjrYoLWLgGto3zoS/WeLmDoO6HxVWdd6 WLE2+mNJx+MzHoxryNrIzPk5arwAokEW4i1SHB2VGKcTUYt+epUhwqPLswgPPuj1 Z5cCUWaa3bx2Ct0ZdfCBA2pHNew=
In-reply-to: <54E3C127.90308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <54E22F82.4070904@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAFN1edqqgSw-Qym2tK1FCoEw+jnXtExPESWg6DrgCdezfjzsJA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <54E261A8.5050100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAFN1edoROpNok6ZCkAaxTjMQrqG_wD_+d=w_W4-RoCWOLYkqUg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <54E37A81.9060904@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <54E3B9E2.8080808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <54E3BFD5.40608@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <54E3C127.90308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Moritz Bartl:
> On 02/17/2015 11:25 PM, Nusenu wrote:
>> I'm wondering if simply (blindly) running two tor processes per 
>> available IP is any worse than anything else from a pure "lets
>> push as much traffic as we can" (on a host not on a tor process
>> level).
> 
> I don't see a problem with that either, unless the destination is
> CPU or memory constrained.
> 
> We have (and had) servers with 16 IPs -- Dual Core, 2-4GB RAM, 100 
> Mbit/s and less. Maybe not too nice to spin up 32 Tor relays on
> such machines? But I think in general it is fair to go with "2 per
> IP", and expect the server to be configured to listen on a sane
> number of IPs.

I'm wondering why a relay (not bridge) op would order that many IP
addresses on a host were he can not make use of it, but adding a
simple check like "stop creating new instances once RAM/instancecount
below X" is possible (or "ok lets use the remaining IPs for bridges" ;).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=3MZ0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] automation needs of big relay ops (implemented as ansible role)
  - From: Moritz Bartl

References:
- [tor-relays] new ansible-tor features: automatic instance configuration + automatic MyFamily generation (PATCH)
  - From: Nusenu
- Re: [tor-relays] new ansible-tor features: automatic instance configuration + automatic MyFamily generation (PATCH)
  - From: David Stainton
- Re: [tor-relays] new ansible-tor features: automatic instance configuration + automatic MyFamily generation (PATCH)
  - From: Nusenu
- Re: [tor-relays] new ansible-tor features: automatic instance configuration + automatic MyFamily generation (PATCH)
  - From: David Stainton
- Re: [tor-relays] new ansible-tor features: automatic instance configuration + automatic MyFamily generation (PATCH)
  - From: Nusenu
- Re: [tor-relays] new ansible-tor features: automatic instance configuration + automatic MyFamily generation (PATCH)
  - From: Moritz Bartl
- [tor-relays] automation needs of big relay ops (implemented as ansible role)
  - From: Nusenu
- Re: [tor-relays] automation needs of big relay ops (implemented as ansible role)
  - From: Moritz Bartl

Prev by Author: [tor-relays] automation needs of big relay ops (implemented as ansible role)
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] automation needs of big relay ops (implemented as ansible role)
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] automation needs of big relay ops (implemented as ansible role)
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] automation needs of big relay ops (implemented as ansible role)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread