[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] biggest guard operator apparently left the tor network

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] biggest guard operator apparently left the tor network
From: SuperSluether <supersluether@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:46:57 -0600
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 09:47:16 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=0qWxtXBmqsxML+nFYP/Q+ZYjd19Ps0CFYV7wPZGVPzg=; b=Q5vO4Y12+TabQXR4a5YCwXcAxL5YuFeV8luCoy9tTTXbsdlvVznyIiQ+fo7fE9AGSd FyB+LuG0AORdu5iTsgi9UOwCg4UGspFGGJAhy99pgXbukdVB39A7yQO0RCxnidISEIR0 URpxHx6ercnZ9Ai5pxUK2Djv7NxtZKgXnoFerqwELmDlL/XdSGzGr+XqWHGn+rCbIlN+ GO+FzAS30CYJIMgeKCK56J3Z8DswuABNuWJ0Myq3nCEt2xJjpSBzF2QSyO/Lxm0Ss9G3 tEU98f3t0JWnu63o0encknSwqyM0aZn3q+anVDMNmsyBMGX2XpCTnLs6xjjubk96rzKF qznA==
In-reply-to: <56D306BA.30602@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <56D2EF71.7090307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56D306BA.30602@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1

From what I understand, the 3% that was lost should eventually be distributed to the remaining relays, correct?

On 02/28/2016 08:39 AM, Kurt Besig wrote:

On 2/28/2016 5:00 AM, nusenu wrote:

Looks like SG.GS stopped their guard relays. They had >3% guard probability.

+-------+------------+------------------------------------------+
| Con5  | lastseen   | fingerprint                              |
+-------+------------+------------------------------------------+
| SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 675C5A2C2EC403B6B583735191042CF489D4E5DA |
| SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | C3D51AAF129FED507053244ADA29353D01AD5C90 |
| SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | B9B927347E005256D5D48007C38208FE8F7CC3BE |
| SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 075A4D8D7662DF566FCE390FC820C539BFBBA867 |
| SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 53E2060F64DF258597E738FD5608D2939B92BC1D |
| SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 963ADC0137505151C1AFA6757DD2367EDEEC7B62 |
| SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | B4697BA6520A17A7F51E613018754BA5FD46D0A0 |
| SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 951BDBA042A69FE8577129EA301B027A879B985B |
| SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | D905EEADE0A40C7C0E6A8102708CF16AB8ED9A35 |
| SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 593B6169DA24F3835F0B485317C0DB529B8F3E58 |
| SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 0519D312F1BD9668B3B43751E0934911E4C79C79 |
| SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | D9BFC55DDD8152F06D87C9DA7D192E86FC628626 |
| SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 38F423A4320380FFE32DB60B72E7457CD6E3F096 |
+-------+------------+------------------------------------------+



_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

And what do you think this means to the network as a whole?

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] biggest guard operator apparently left the tor network
  - From: Tim Wilson-Brown - teor

References:
- [tor-relays] biggest guard operator apparently left the tor network
  - From: nusenu
- Re: [tor-relays] biggest guard operator apparently left the tor network
  - From: Kurt Besig

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Stable Flag Question
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Light Bandwidth Monitor (like Munin)
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] biggest guard operator apparently left the tor network
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] biggest guard operator apparently left the tor network
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread