Send tor-relays mailing list submissions to
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
tor-relays-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
tor-relays-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of tor-relays digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. large server farms (contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
2. Re: large server farms (teor)
3. Re: large server farms (Duncan)
4. Re: large server farms (I)
5. Re: large server farms (niftybunny)
6. Re: large server farms (anondroid)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 16:44:25 -0800
From: contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tor-relays] large server farms
Message-ID: <457551c757ee4a355917f577d2f9a7ba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
I'm highly interested in us creating a large server farm for Tor
services. The only question is how to get the coaxial cable ran from
the
server facility to each subscriber. The power requirements could be
handled by solar and wind systems and any water needs can be created by
means of water collection systems and solar heat collectors for hot
water. I think it's totally feasible. What do you guys think?
Also, I'm very hardcore about taking back the internet for the people.
No more of this for-profit stuff where we get throttled and our freedom
of speech is abridged. Internet for the people is a means of freedom of
speech. Let's take it back.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:47:46 +1100
From: teor <teor2345@xxxxxxxxx>
To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] large server farms
Message-ID: <E696CA8C-A1A6-4D14-8B3C-E901C81E7D55@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On 20 Feb 2017, at 11:44, contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I'm highly interested in us creating a large server farm for Tor
services. The only question is how to get the coaxial cable ran from
the server facility to each subscriber
Tor is a decentralised network, that's designed to be secure even if
users aren't directly connected to their network entry points.
Can you tell us what you're trying to achieve for users by centralising
Tor services like this?
(And what services you intend to provide?)
T
--
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
xmpp: teor at torproject dot org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL:
<http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20170220/a3cbec03/attachment-0001.sig>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 01:41:47 +0000
From: Duncan <dguthrie@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] large server farms
Message-ID: <e6b68354-6c4d-94ed-1eab-5c60a8c9ecca@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi
This seems like it would centralize some of the network. There are
already concerns about regular data-centers being able to access Tor
relays - someone malicious (yourself, someone compelling you, another
party etc) could then have access to lots of Tor relays at once, for
good or ill.
Have you considered these issues at all?
D
On 20/02/17 00:44, contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I'm highly interested in us creating a large server farm for Tor
services. The only question is how to get the coaxial cable ran from
the server facility to each subscriber. The power requirements could
be handled by solar and wind systems and any water needs can be
created by means of water collection systems and solar heat collectors
for hot water. I think it's totally feasible. What do you guys think?
Also, I'm very hardcore about taking back the internet for the people.
No more of this for-profit stuff where we get throttled and our
freedom of speech is abridged. Internet for the people is a means of
freedom of speech. Let's take it back.
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 18:31:41 -0800
From: I <beatthebastards@xxxxxxxxx>
To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] large server farms
Message-ID: <8F58CC00C4E.000004E8beatthebastards@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Hot water?
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 03:36:37 +0100
From: niftybunny <abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] large server farms
Message-ID:
<76C7DBC4-5884-4946-A4B7-35E800A7A128@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Personal hygiene is very important, Pig-Pen.
niftybunny
abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 20 Feb 2017, at 03:31, I <beatthebastards@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hot water?
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20170220/bebddc38/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:34:35 -0500
From: anondroid <tor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] large server farms
Message-ID:
<B52sc6WG_bzt4KVfKGLfClm4alHdpOg_Kc-d7kVF3sGkqhmVFmBXHRTjIuucVzocjhstUnaDdwCyeZFQUev5cugaQCzVtrjfZKrGTOs33Uw=@anondroid.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
how to get the coaxial cable ran from the server facility to each
subscriber
Wut?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20170220/e8929535/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
------------------------------
End of tor-relays Digest, Vol 73, Issue 29
******************************************