[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] plans to require ContactInfo to be non-empty

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] plans to require ContactInfo to be non-empty
From: teor <teor@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 15:16:11 +0000
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 10:17:12 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1549466219; bh=gZ8aDN7Abt4+1bIb68JXUDccTOg1vtsfLzOHd7BxdVQ=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:From:From; b=QhhxSxWT+Qu2RLi0TEHayIkGtO6vWcfnPrHyfWBf239DzUY0vw0CEJ8u1g5gV2FoO dOG+PWfFAk60hsmL6ElbWvqpdfU3RT7et7xkzGYMI8DirFZgXzvhiaUJV4cIav4mJp TFE1Xm096vvE2oqMRoUEmQQV23nYmURigHLVkGAc=
In-reply-to: <CAD2Ti2845ARnin7-LHC-peG135a+Z3RQX3NMNkQRwmHkZ94s0g@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <5d58ca17-7470-2675-f675-92f9239ae497@riseup.net> <20190206025733.57dc1a84@natsu> <20190206031458.372a5204@natsu> <CAD2Ti2845ARnin7-LHC-peG135a+Z3RQX3NMNkQRwmHkZ94s0g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi,

On February 6, 2019 10:48:29 AM UTC, grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...

>
>And if nicknames go away (status on that proposal),
>then contact is likely to absorb that function, including
>the current always present nature of nickname.

There is no proposal to remove Nicknames.

The authorities don't vote for the Named flag any more, because relying on names to identify relays is fragile.

I'm not sure if we have removed the special handling code for Named yet.

T

--
teor
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

References:
- [tor-relays] plans to require ContactInfo to be non-empty
  - From: nusenu
- Re: [tor-relays] plans to require ContactInfo to be non-empty
  - From: Roman Mamedov
- Re: [tor-relays] plans to require ContactInfo to be non-empty
  - From: Roman Mamedov
- Re: [tor-relays] plans to require ContactInfo to be non-empty
  - From: grarpamp

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Running 2 relays with 0.4.0.2_alpha [err] descriptor at 0x8a0acdb0830 begins with unexpected string "".
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Tor meetup @ Onionspace, Berlin
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] plans to require ContactInfo to be non-empty
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] plans to require ContactInfo to be non-empty
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread