Re: [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting

[Eddie <stunnel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2/24/2021 12:34 PM, William Kane wrote:
> Thank you for running obfs4 bridges with iat_mode != 0, only very few
> obfs4 bridges support the additional traffic obfuscation in both
> directions.
>
> Kudos to you my friend.
>
> - William
Should I take this as a recommendation to update my bridges to support 
iat_mode=2.

Cheers.
> 2021-02-23 1:18 GMT, torjoy <south_america_bridges@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I work with time and frequency references and run some tor bridges. What is
> > the objective of "iat_mode" setting? Is an good timming reference important
> > for this setting? For now, i'm adminstrating 3 briges, one with iat_mode=0,
> > iat_mode=1 and iat_mode=2.
> > Could you explain or forward me to some reading about it?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Luiz
> >
> > Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail was checked for spam by the freeware edition of CleanMail.
> The freeware edition is restricted to personal and non-commercial use.
> You can remove this notice by purchasing a commercial license:
> http://antispam.byteplant.com/products/cleanmail/index.html

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays