On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 06:30:35PM +0100, Toralf Förster wrote:
> SO why is this not the default?The feature introduces a substantial performance penalty for a dubious
and poorly understood privacy gain. If I were to write an algorithm to
detect obfs4, I wouldn't bother dealing with its flow properties; there
are easier ways to identify the protocol. In hindsight, it was probably
a mistake to expose the iat option to users and bridge operators.Cheers,
Philipp
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
- References:
- [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting
- From: torjoy
- Re: [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting
- From: William Kane
- Re: [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting
- From: Toralf Förster
- Re: [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting
- From: Philipp Winter
- Prev by Author: [tor-relays] ulyssa
- Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] orport
- Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting
- Next by thread: [tor-relays] IPv6 auto-discovery vs. privacy extensions
- Index(es):