[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] mouseHouse - Why not used more?

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] mouseHouse - Why not used more?
From: k e bera <keb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 21:12:51 -0800 (PST)
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:18:46 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cyblings.on.ca; s=google; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :x-mailer:x-message-flag:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3V4OGZFCO55Bj336Dg9uCD9FVwd8/5/CYx6hj0BS798=; b=SX4+94+ZYf0p3QgkwXDqosTV4a46Gu//5iRijerSy3Of0Wl6mdx1mIxbqNm4u4suZy hREiLHkHksU7LpIeAlRg+5ydba/cayCTkPJUlmodwQ9tl4HLffE1/y9xUg6aUwEBEK+v w/1WREHcbCAs7KmHnFF0KdKWxh1Jt5QcOyrn0=
In-reply-to: <50FF6217.2060000@xxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <50FF6217.2060000@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 23:07:51 -0500
Sina Eetezadi <sina.eetezadi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I am wondering why my TOR server "mouseHouse" is not used more? I
> configured 40k and 60k burst, buts its only barely used.
> Any hints?

mouseHouse is a middle relay up for only 1 day, not showing the Fast or Guard or Stable flags so it would not likely be chosen by Tor clients building circuits.  It can take a few days uptime to get those flags and accumulate some traffic.  Low bandwidth relays (those in the bottom 
http://torstatus.rueckgr.at/router_detail.php?FP=5101b7d9b4b0dbd525644b549a7d0b197eaa4205

See also these posts in the tor-relays list archives.
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2010-December/000256.html
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2011-September/000951.html
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2012-November/026467.html
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

References:
- [tor-relays] mouseHouse - Why not used more?
  - From: Sina Eetezadi

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] running relay severely degrades network performance eventually
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Call for discussion: turning funding into more exit relays
Previous by thread: [tor-relays] mouseHouse - Why not used more?
Next by thread: [tor-relays] Can I enable IPv6?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread