-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 19/01/15 20:14, Bram de Boer wrote:
Sebastian wrote:
One theory might be that the addition of a new bwauth has
shifted which vote gets picked for the consensus. It's
conceivable that bwauths rate relays which are placed
topologically close higher than others.
Thank you for your suggestion. I hope that is not the case and the
drop in consensus weight is just a temporary glitch. I will post to
the development mailing list to see if the techies can comment on
this.
Paying hundreds of dollars of my hard earned money for a relay that
is not being used by the network is not something I will keep doing
for long. I support the goals and ideology of Tor, but the project
will lose me as a volunteer if consensus weight does not restore
soon.
Did you check whether the consensus weight *fraction* also dropped?
If all consensus weights dropped by a certain factor, there's no
change in the probability of clients choosing your relay at all.
Take a look at Atlas' or Globe's consensus weight fraction graphs and
see if they changed over the past weeks or months.
All the best,
Karsten
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUvV7zAAoJEJd5OEYhk8hIvWgIAJi002cwqJbZv03t67QGCs1L
DlNt50+i00zoIaYw7eVZV5F6DtkO1WRRR9VRBHgfufz2q5xj1YccR5a/mMdtZvVV
T1PT0b1lXox7Hhogj7SKuvYKTbpgbTZh0WIq66ysoMBS8LqY0ZFcwiLZQs9fwo/J
D1F/xsPZzjgm3GiBktmQH479LZT588Y8qzt3LGpKBpu2aXQF81YLv8plbJAo9Oh7
atD4xTZlSpA7MntJ7Rnn67aChaYDn2QgERWH+b04rloU9NGhmkBXuDZxBBb4/EWo
ShxOshZRNRlcicbbm8dcaHdEVpnxi1Pl7ztidkoK2jYxOSnAqVfkayWpW7BjiIs=
=4doV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays