[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[tor-relays] what's up(down) with gablemoo?

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tor-relays] what's up(down) with gablemoo?
From: starlight.2016q1@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:23:52 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:24:05 -0500
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Lately 'gabelmoo' had been bouncing down and up like a ping-pong ball.

Because gabelmoo is a BWauth (of which only five exist) as well as a normal authority, the impact is greater than if it did not participate in bandwidth measurement.  Disrupts the consensus median.

Does anyone know anything about it?

Thanks

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] what's up(down) with gablemoo?
  - From: Sebastian Hahn

Prev by Author: [tor-relays] avoid exclusion from FallBack Dir list: do not start during minute 49
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] what's up(down) with gablemoo?
Previous by thread: [tor-relays] Location of private key on Android?
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] what's up(down) with gablemoo?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread