[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Running a relay with low transfer limits

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Running a relay with low transfer limits
From: Simon Fischer <tor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 21:31:37 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 15:40:22 -0500
In-reply-to: <f03a133c-fa0f-696c-53e5-93d70ba16f5d@fu110.de>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20170104185423.GB4084@server.tagos.us> <77091235-c276-390e-0da5-3ae45eee4160@gmx.de> <03c63e86-4ba1-9df0-67c4-bfd210af2578@fu110.de> <20170104201818.GA4454@server.tagos.us> <f03a133c-fa0f-696c-53e5-93d70ba16f5d@fu110.de>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Why don't you use the Accounting setting?
AccountingMax and AccountingStart in the settings.
I think the only downside with it is that Tor does not advertise the
directory port.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=faXm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] Running a relay with low transfer limits
  - From: teor

References:
- [tor-relays] Running a relay with low transfer limits
  - From: ike
- Re: [tor-relays] Running a relay with low transfer limits
  - From: Toralf Förster
- Re: [tor-relays] Running a relay with low transfer limits
  - From: Random Mirror / Tor Node Operator
- Re: [tor-relays] Running a relay with low transfer limits
  - From: ike
- Re: [tor-relays] Running a relay with low transfer limits
  - From: Random Mirror / Tor Node Operator

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Uptime missing from Arm
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Uptime missing from Arm
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Running a relay with low transfer limits
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Running a relay with low transfer limits
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread