[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] connlimit: better to use "DROP" or "REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset"?

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] connlimit: better to use "DROP" or "REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset"?
From: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 22:46:06 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:46:26 -0500
In-reply-to: <A7BA634E-2A7C-4BF3-A224-44AE2E6921B2@gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <7wID4EZnjygiYeZweXBnKOrz7rTXCbaBPJ2czBBlAGpo31INE74N7tED1LsBDC9SsPo3XHOqDR4sX-YYNv70_AjLAoCzKWrZcteEotKZI5Q=@anondroid.com> <CAKCAbMjfR_zB+htJrWCx3jH7g82zsEOH5GAG9OHMK=ekU4FO0A@mail.gmail.com> <D470FEE0-7528-449F-B520-9E9438F1992B@gmail.com> <712A9445-26A7-4261-A509-CB2629718278@gmail.com> <0e402d1b-3d88-55a6-efdb-2c54aa91e3dd@gmx.de> <A7BA634E-2A7C-4BF3-A224-44AE2E6921B2@gmail.com>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2

On 01/11/2018 02:10 AM, teor wrote:
> As far as I can tell, this single rule has the same effect:
Even if " -P INPUT   DROP" is et ?

-- 
Toralf
PGP C4EACDDE 0076E94E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] connlimit: better to use "DROP" or "REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset"?
  - From: teor

References:
- [tor-relays] connlimit: better to use "DROP" or "REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset"?
  - From: tor
- Re: [tor-relays] connlimit: better to use "DROP" or "REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset"?
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: [tor-relays] connlimit: better to use "DROP" or "REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset"?
  - From: teor
- Re: [tor-relays] connlimit: better to use "DROP" or "REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset"?
  - From: teor
- Re: [tor-relays] connlimit: better to use "DROP" or "REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset"?
  - From: Toralf Förster
- Re: [tor-relays] connlimit: better to use "DROP" or "REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset"?
  - From: teor

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] connlimit: better to use "DROP" or "REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset"?
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] updateFallbackDirs.py issues
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] connlimit: better to use "DROP" or "REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset"?
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] connlimit: better to use "DROP" or "REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset"?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread