[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[tor-relays] %include in torrc

To: "tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [tor-relays] %include in torrc
From: ylms <tor@xxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 18:36:41 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 12:42:02 -0500
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2

Hello

Is arm supposed to complain about the line with the %include as "The
torrc differs from what tor's using. You can issue a sighup to reload
the torrc values....".

It also complains, that the ExitPolicy, which is now in an %include
file, is missing. So that seems to be bogus.

Tor 0.4.2.5 in this particular case.

Thanks
yl
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] %include in torrc
  - From: Toralf Förster

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] %include in torrc
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Consensus Weight Dropping/Authority Issues?
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] %include in torrc
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread