Re: [tor-relays] Consensus Weight Dropping/Authority Issues?

[niftybunny <abuse-contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 7. Jan 2020, at 18:20, r1610091651 <r1610091651@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Consensus & usage are independent

consensus: based on available bandwidth

load: based on usage by tor clients.

if total available bw increases but load doesn't, observed load on a node will drop.

We are talking about Exists.

                                                                                                          b n

On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 17:27, John Ricketts <john@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I also would like to add to this - if it were just the Tor network increasing in size I could see my consensus weight dropping and my bandwidth staying the same.  I'm simply not getting the 7-8gbit/sec traffic I was.  Truly odd.

-----Original Message-----
From: tor-relays <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Toralf Förster
Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2020 7:30 AM
To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Consensus Weight Dropping/Authority Issues?

On 1/7/20 1:57 PM, John Ricketts wrote:
> I have been watching the consensus weight and bandwidth of all of my 50 exit nodes drop consistently over the past few months. I have not made any hardware changes in my data center


Which correlates to https://metrics.torproject.org/bandwidth.html - your fraction just decreases if more and more relays join the party.

--
Toralf

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays