[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] DNS Timeouts - I think the threshold for overload needs raising

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] DNS Timeouts - I think the threshold for overload needs raising
From: John Csuti via tor-relays <tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 07:51:54 -0500
Authentication-results: smtp.coolcomputers.info (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=coolcomputers.info
Cc: John Csuti <postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 09:14:25 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=coolcomputers.info; s=dkim; t=1642337516; bh=AJlAt9DomTXw9bIR/CNksiy3YWrxzDvzF1ncVa/8zbg=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=cyLa1DHbqBwZiwcs6hPWrhvWqoGHYPWdHfMlIf5M801mZ25OSLzZQdCKuLr2R2AON 2zjULbaZEsvB+dXNvn0wCxK4nzbMKSfAhIU7vNULyldY8nsoduW5wRVClt4CtH4qSM rE1K/B6EXd9NeFtw4ErFFGfjdQdyJO2xgLq3kTPPv8asPos/SjqlYh4qLp9Gsg5YRj q35EbWsSYgzNooUp6PqsTu38C3W8tAxEnZ0ToqjXt9YpB++v2qZ9XyefgXNipXmeIL /pVLzXV+7TPSTfRNPdmE7gRJ46UM3uPfTrmjkvX0k4hcI2mXubRMZcRHzBMR5w9JWG tXzyzDr1ZbuDw==
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=coolcomputers.info; s=dkim; t=1642337515; bh=AJlAt9DomTXw9bIR/CNksiy3YWrxzDvzF1ncVa/8zbg=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=U3yjhtbhUspVYTo3y2M8oTEGSZWg5hGZgfdWixkq2TYHq3NthXLDh+HS1siPzt5rS yxtemYdvM4HbQMhl9mDYz821XEM24h1rcjWwPTZ0/B8o9ZdcoW6zqgV2DWh1niUht0 kDje8vJ1aNbkcMU3ZX+ZpyqSdu2NXI1T3zeU+8EsMM6tb+0SFuDu71CpfxTAPPxKCM myFbmyUYIqKwwEV1OaC9haRPkPpObY40lnDjHtSGcSoQAfxlzKNRl0p+EFGdA5sCw9 4Jb4A4Hiu04pgFbptMHSM+ChlIJYOYn/Jiyr1GMhxFKmnEmMkM/GkuLKIxqtoY7vW5 IVlgwWQryjNAQ==
In-reply-to: <CAH9HpnzBdXoYE4HPxdPdueE8_jL1OJ2g2qG2U=cuuvSDYCKp=g@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAH9HpnzBdXoYE4HPxdPdueE8_jL1OJ2g2qG2U=cuuvSDYCKp=g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Update your version of tor this is an old issue that has been fixed in the latest version.

Thanks,
John C.

> On Jan 16, 2022, at 4:17 AM, AMuse <tor-amuse@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi all!
> 
> I'm operating a TOR Exit on dedicated hardware. The load average is low (0.07) and the network load is fine (120Mb/sec out of a 1Gb/sec link). Connections aren't being dropped, and for all I can see things are fine.
> 
> However, on the TOR Metrics relay search, my exit consistently shows as "Overloaded" due to DNS failures.
> 
> From my logs, I never go above 2% in DNS failures and from the debugging I've done so far it looks like most of the failures are in IPv6 lookups not returning an AAAA record because the destination site has no AAAA configured.
> 
> Could whoever runs the "Overloaded" flag consider upping the overload limit to 2% or so?  Or, can we tune out ipv6 and ipv4 failures separately maybe?
> 
> This was never an issue until I configured my relay for v6.
> 
> 
> 
> ===========
> 
> Jan 15 19:57:45.000 [notice] General overload -> DNS timeouts (65) fraction 1.0619% is above threshold of 1.0000%
> Jan 15 20:07:45.000 [notice] General overload -> DNS timeouts (67) fraction 1.0124% is above threshold of 1.0000%
> Jan 15 20:17:45.000 [notice] General overload -> DNS timeouts (71) fraction 1.1275% is above threshold of 1.0000%
> Jan 15 20:27:45.000 [notice] General overload -> DNS timeouts (94) fraction 1.4003% is above threshold of 1.0000%
> Jan 15 20:37:45.000 [notice] General overload -> DNS timeouts (72) fraction 1.2000% is above threshold of 1.0000%
> Jan 15 20:47:45.000 [notice] General overload -> DNS timeouts (75) fraction 1.2517% is above threshold of 1.0000%
> Jan 15 20:57:45.000 [notice] General overload -> DNS timeouts (70) fraction 1.1605% is above threshold of 1.0000%
> Jan 15 21:07:45.000 [notice] General overload -> DNS timeouts (92) fraction 1.6028% is above threshold of 1.0000%
> Jan 15 21:17:45.000 [notice] General overload -> DNS timeouts (73) fraction 1.3290% is above threshold of 1.0000%
> Jan 15 21:27:45.000 [notice] General overload -> DNS timeouts (73) fraction 1.2907% is above threshold of 1.0000%
> Jan 15 21:37:45.000 [notice] General overload -> DNS timeouts (65) fraction 1.0095% is above threshold of 1.0000%
> Jan 15 21:47:45.000 [notice] General overload -> DNS timeouts (83) fraction 1.2635% is above threshold of 1.0000%
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] DNS Timeouts - I think the threshold for overload needs raising
  - From: AMuse

References:
- [tor-relays] DNS Timeouts - I think the threshold for overload needs raising
  - From: AMuse

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] We need bridges with iat-mode set to 1 and especially 2 as well!
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] IPV6 address keeps changing every 2-3 days
Previous by thread: [tor-relays] DNS Timeouts - I think the threshold for overload needs raising
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] DNS Timeouts - I think the threshold for overload needs raising
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread