[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-relays] Call for discussion: turning funding into more exit relays
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 07/25/2012 12:34 PM, Julian Wissmann wrote:
> Please don't forget non profits, like 501(c)3, under which
> probably many hackerspaces in the US fall or the german e.V., like
> Zwiebelfreunde e.V., who run torservers.net
> <http://torservers.net/>.
Absolutely! I meant to use LLC's as an example as they are much easier
to form than a 501(c)3 exempt organization, but my wording was poor. I
intended that to be read, "any company that's not a sole proprietorship."
> I disagree again. We're on the verge of cheap,affordable 10GBit
> (as in torservers has just gotten an offer for unlimited traffic
> 10GBit for $750 with SWIP from a hoster who seems Tor friendly).
> This means, that 100mbit is getting cheaper and cheaper, as does
> GBit. 100mbit already comes at a price diadvantage compared to
> gbit, we don't nead to start on cost-effectiveness of 10mbit, not
> to mention that many people in the west could run 10mbit nodes from
> home by now.
Perhaps you're right; has anyone done any network simulations or run
any tests to see what would be better for network latency and/or
anonymity (more low-throughput relays, or a few larger relays)?
Regardless, I don't think the speed/bandwidth cap (if there is one)
should be set too high. In many countries it may be difficult—if not
impossible—to run a 10, or even a 1GBit node. As great as lots of
1(0+)GBit nodes would be, we don't want to end up with plenty of nodes
in the USA, GB, Germany, etc. and very few elsewhere. Geographic
diversity is also extremely important for the project. That being
said, if we can get good geographic diversity while only paying for
larger nodes it might be more cost-effective. Again, this might need
(further?) research.
—Sam
- --
Sam Whited
pub 4096R/EC2C9934
SamWhited.com
sam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
404.492.6008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=CFjY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays