Re: [tor-relays] Electronic surveillance on major tor exits

[Name Withheld <survivd@xxxxxxxxx>]

I meant "we" as in "our nodes."  I can guarantee any node you run (of 
size) sees that kind of traffic run through it.  If you think it 
doesn't, I suspect you'll change your mind after spending 30 seconds on 
IRC talking to an average user.



On 7/26/2012 7:57 AM, mick wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:03:24 -1000
> Name Withheld <survivd@xxxxxxxxx> allegedly wrote:
>   
> > Most Tor users probably don't read the manual and follow best
> > practices.  I'm sure we've all seen traffic where users are using
> > google maps to find directions from their home, or logging into their
> > true-name mail accounts.  When you combine this "State of our Method"
> > with a choke on the number
> I'm surprised that no-one else seems to have picked up on this. But no,
> "we have /not/ all seen traffic where users" are doing something....
> Because we aren't looking at user's traffic. And we damned well should
> not be.
>
> Mick
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> blog: baldric.net
> fingerprint: FC23 3338 F664 5E66 876B  72C0 0A1F E60B 5BAD D312
>
> Note that I have recently upgraded my GPG key see:
> http://baldric.net/2012/07/20/gpg-key-upgrade/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays