[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly
From: Marina Brown <catskillmarina@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 06:20:29 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 06:22:53 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=v5DXH+2VMJ/TBM3a5QB5dmXlnkjKwDDVsUHVC1tMBz4=; b=kkd0H6pFiHdN6OGxjyw35OfEoXD6D6I0bmhIWCqZveMZw29plbj5Inqkrwe6LPjIZX 5bTdL7/8RhTVJr0wXX6ZklcwaV/HkOyOb4IAzChO9NiYLOSTwutif+CXpNVDRpR+5JCF lb2SErrD0UCOrQ7/k6Z+F3WczmdEML8sr5Y5Iodw0EPQ4SR2QYpOkEeY5SWx11uq1TkE s1g/rKyT6bU5MMJj7R1QUyrW6gr6MFQV01w/I3UDgTjaE5lEjJnwkh0b8Fe4T1ZrnP2M lVuraK0UFnCEkTg/oejaCZFgY2XzKkQXMfcE8M1yTFnWypw4YWZOcJBXyyt0e8hnTKpi OAAg==
In-reply-to: <CAD2Ti29tg7BxmEFeNTw2OENe75kucedpv9mmrHt7PMKWJxb87Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CA+cU71n55f039e4A61QCkNuUNMYmvGQX+NCzW8ZfHiVxjstjHA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130718165144.72e0054e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <51E81195.3060303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130718174449.4bdc6ac2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <51E82CE7.40804@xxxxxxxxx> <CAD2Ti29tg7BxmEFeNTw2OENe75kucedpv9mmrHt7PMKWJxb87Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/19/2013 12:24 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> I don't see anything specific regarding Tor or its capabilities in
> their AUP. But there are bits that could be extended to cover Tor.
> Which it appears they did, whether for bandwidth or cost of dealing
> with 'complaints'.

It seems they may already have changed their AUP.

'contain any kind of proxy server or other traffic relaying programs'.

- --- Marina Brown


> 
> They are in New Hampshire, perhaps you could let the 
> FreeStateProject know (cc: SV) that they are perhaps not a company
> that FreeStater's should patronize.
> 
> Also, asking a hosters via their support/sales staff if they permit
> Tor is not helpful. These droids do not have the authority to do
> anything other than take the sale and kick you later. You need to
> talk with someone higher up beforehand if you wish to secure
> better long term footing from any provider.
> 
> Their AUP is ridiculous. Which is even more curious given they seem
> to be run by Russians and permit feedback reviews by hosted
> 'gaming' and 'teen-sex' sites on their front page. 
> _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing
> list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=mEse
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

References:
- [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly
  - From: Tom Ritter
- Re: [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly
  - From: mick
- Re: [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly
  - From: krishna e bera
- Re: [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly
  - From: mick
- Re: [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly
  - From: Marina Brown
- Re: [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly
  - From: grarpamp

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] How does CERT-FI know my SOCKS4 port?
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread