[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] BWauth no-consensus state in effect

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] BWauth no-consensus state in effect
From: nusenu <nusenu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 20:53:33 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:54:03 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=openmailbox.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :in-reply-to:mime-version:date:date:message-id:from:from :references:subject:subject:received; s=openmailbox; t= 1438282425; bh=G8mTpB0O5HDaqsxZR2N96G2abmgzB/deSiuSz+THeiA=; b=r 1xntCtdpSyLvo4cQ1Rid1qroFvCo6gs3dHvQwIvkSN3rJGZbsxPk4mf/ZPSyWKyu /9yRqNUY3N88qehskwpJtGmi+T6MGS9cl4fh1UuP9j4yKcTF2doOPKOaa9L2xc5I tUYG2YPdjjHFzEaAhKtEsjk63x5t/YZ3d45UOkFFvU=
In-reply-to: <6.2.5.6.2.20150730130415.072b77e8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20150730130415.072b77e8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi,

starlight.2015q2@xxxxxxxxxxx:
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/16696

thanks for this info.

Has this fallback happened before (=some experience on the potential
impact available) or is this outage happening for the first time since
the bwauths are in place?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=p+Fb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

References:
- [tor-relays] BWauth no-consensus state in effect
  - From: starlight . 2015q2

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] pinning relay keys to IPs (or not)
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] BWauth no-consensus state in effect
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] BWauth no-consensus state in effect
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread