[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Darknet Shenanigans [was: suspicious "Relay127001" relays]



> On 7 Jul 2016, at 15:29, Andreas Krey <a.krey@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 06 Jul 2016 15:06:00 +0000, grarpamp wrote:
> ...
>> https://boingboing.net/2016/07/01/researchers-find-over-100-spyi.html
> 
> Is there a way to make tor log connection attempts to any ports
> on an hidden service address, independent of whether the port
> actually has a HiddenServicePort?
> 
>> All quite expected and well known ever since the
>> dawn of overlay networks. Same with the Internet.
> 
> Also, wasn't there a change that made discovery impossible?

We're working on it, and it's called "next generation hidden services".
Until then, relays get banned for this behaviour.

Tim

Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays