[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] increasing per IP tor instance limit (2 instances per one IPv4)

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] increasing per IP tor instance limit (2 instances per one IPv4)
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 02:02:00 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 02:03:05 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=QAtFSdYzrlIXdJiUBgIyT6c/2TDhPTPpeAQoUJ4JeSU=; b=gtiFYDi2ltBimdiBMWHiebohz+ArVW2i5neZbT5xVIx59NEV6WASfV8jrXKi9B84pl USD45TpsKRNeLdH1MGbN12AjOZ6IB0IMVX+77MrRCWt6CJB3eh4b6ufVWRkKqZAzzNf9 ywTb08pPhd+PGjmin7vgUVk+VJRouE0RNV8w855VamzQpV/dfKKFfXj0Je5X10B3MBIB Q9m8DaUOHHHUT3bFrNDbRlhYeViTo1DMT/s6RAwcSFVXFee8q4ZQ9U8jpBs84gevRRE7 Sp5VXNCLlAIZH4ZV0XI6OdTJ96HZ2NVAbIamDYOdoAdbjtUgN8V2EHf226BW5m3WrutS mA5Q==
In-reply-to: <B79B3AF6-ABFD-4884-8F8B-03959B168529@gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <54aad453-a76b-cb8f-d51a-10f4eca6a7d3@riseup.net> <B79B3AF6-ABFD-4884-8F8B-03959B168529@gmail.com>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Even support for >1 per /24 is questionable when facing sybil,
and it lets people be lazy piling on known hosters instead of shopping
around for new tor / crypto friendly providers and supporting that by
throwing money at them.

If you want to 'get your money worth' then also run I2P, Freenet,
CJDNS, Pond, Gnunet, Mixminion, etc etc nodes on your contract.

Tor isn't everything.
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

References:
- [tor-relays] increasing per IP tor instance limit (2 instances per one IPv4)
  - From: nusenu
- Re: [tor-relays] increasing per IP tor instance limit (2 instances per one IPv4)
  - From: teor

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Bad exit node?
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Exit flag and port 6667 vs 6697
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] increasing per IP tor instance limit (2 instances per one IPv4)
Next by thread: [tor-relays] Windows relay performance: svchost process
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread