Hi Matt,
> On 30 Jul 2019, at 21:18, Matt Westfall <mwestfall@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> You're right, it went offline for around 2 days due to a power outage and a Bios error that needed continue pressed.
>
> That's what the stable flag is for, lol.
>
> I lost guard probability for 2 more weeks.
>
> If a relay has been up connected and stable for more than 2 weeks, it gets the -stable- flag so it's leaned on more.
>
> That doesn't really affect the underlying issue of tor nodes with TONS of bandwidth not being utilized a little more.
>
> But I'm happy to donate whatever the tor protocol decides it wants to use :(Comcast typically has poor peering to Europe and some other top-tier networks.
We've investigated these issues in the past: search the list archives.So your relay's bandwidth to the rest of the tor network may be accurately
represented by its consensus weight.T
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
- References:
- [tor-relays] Unutilized bandwidth
- From: Alec Larsen
- Re: [tor-relays] Unutilized bandwidth
- From: Matt Westfall
- Re: [tor-relays] Unutilized bandwidth
- From: Vasilis
- Re: [tor-relays] Unutilized bandwidth
- From: Matt Westfall
- Re: [tor-relays] Unutilized bandwidth
- From: teor
- Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] DoS attack on Tor exit relay
- Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Call for setting up new obfs4 bridges
- Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Unutilized bandwidth
- Next by thread: [tor-relays] What rules for a fallback dir - the compiled-in fingerprint, a flag from the authorities or both?
- Index(es):